| Website |
Rating |
Article
Date |
Quote |
| Ace's
Hardware |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"It is crystal clear
that the Athlon is still the king in the price/performance department."
|
| Active
Hardware |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Despite the advantage
of a 512KB L2 cache, the Intel Pentium 4 is hard-pressed to match
the power of the Athlon XP."
|
| Amdmb.com
|
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"[The Athlon XP offers] a 4-5% increase in performance when compared
to its predecessor."
|
| Amdzone |
- |
Jan
07 '02 |
"In
summary the Athlon XP 2000+ is another expected speed bump while we
wait for the release of the .13 micron Thoroughbred." |
| Anandtech |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"In virtually all of the tests we conducted the Athlon XP 2000+
was within a negligible amount of percentage points of the 2.2GHz
Pentium 4." |
| Chip.de |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Thanks to AMD: The Athlon XP 2000+ tops the P4 2.2-GHz in 6
out of 7 benchmarks." |
| ExtremeTech |
- |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Athlon
XP 2000+ maintains parity with the 2GHz Northwood in some tests, the
2GHz Northwood CPU pulls ahead of Amd's fastest CPU in many benchmarks." |
| Firing
Squad |
+ |
Jan 09 '02 |
"The Athlon
XP 2000+ is largely capable of keeping up with, if not exceeding the
performance of the "faster" Pentium 4 2.2GHz. ." |
| GamePC |
+ |
Dec
31 '01 |
"While the Pentium 4 may have a few strong points, the Athlon
XP is simply a better chip. " |
| Gamespot |
+ |
Jan
08 '01 |
"The Athlon XP 2000+ at least matches the 2GHz Pentium 4's performance
in most tests, and Athlon systems are still more budget-friendly.
" |
| [H]ard|OCP |
+ |
Jan
07 '01 |
"If you want to compare on a GHz to GHz basis, AMD is still by
far the stronger CPU, hands down." |
| Hardware.fr |
+ |
Jan 07 '02 |
"Indeed,
the new AMD XP 2000+ offers performance equal/better than the P4 2.2
GHz." |
| Heise.de |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"In
many practical benchmarks the difference between Intel's fastest chips
and the AMD Athlon XP 2000+ is almost negligible." |
| Hexus.net |
+ |
Jan 07
'02 |
"It's fairly obvious we have here
the quickest x86 processor that money can buy.
"
|
| Lost
Circuits |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"The
Northwood showed a healthy boost over the Willamette but, in most
applications, did not quite beat the AMD Athlon XP 2000+." |
| PC
Stats |
88% |
Jan
07 '02 |
"The
numbers are definitely pointing to the Athlon XP 2000+ for value in
price, and performance." |
| PC
World |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"[The
new P4's] fail to deal a finishing blow to Athlon XP-based PCs, and--for
now--they offer less value for your money." |
| Sharky
Extreme |
8.5/10 |
Jan 07
'02 |
"The ability
of the Athlon XP 2000+ to keep up [with the P4 2.2GHz] is a victory
of sorts for AMD." |
| SimHQ |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Dollar
for dollar, the AMD processor is a better performer." |
| Target
PC |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"For
the average user, the Athlon XP2000+ remains the smartest solution
for its lower price and good performance." |
| TecChannel.de |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"The
Pentium 4 dominates mainly in programs which are optimized for its
SSE2-Instruction Set. While giving precedence in standard programs
to the Athlon XP" |
| TechHard
|
+ |
Nov
04 '02 |
"XP
outperformed Pentium 4 2.0 (0.18 micron) Ghz in every test." |
| Tech
Report |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Obviously,
the Athlon XP offers the better price-performance ratio." |
| Tom's
Hardware Guide |
+ |
Jan 07
'02 |
"In Office
performance as well as Linux Kernel compiling, the Athlon XP still
takes the lead, despite its 32% clock speed disadvantage!" |
| Van's
Hardware |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"The
Athlon XP dominates its Intel rival and slips by reported scores for
the 2.2GHz P4." |
| VR-Zone
Hardware |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Athlon
XP 2000+ is still able to overpower the P4 2.0AGhz but was unable
to surpass the P4 2.2Ghz." |
| X-Bit
Labs |
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Athlon
XP retains the leading positions only in those applications, which
require powerful computing unit. " |
| ZDNet.de
|
+ |
Jan
07 '02 |
"Only
with very well optimized software can the P4/2200 maintain ground
[with the Athlon XP 2000+]." |